The main guiding principle in all cases involving guardianship, parental responsibilities, parenting time, and contact with a child in British Columbia is the best interests of the children.
Unfortunately, this sometimes gets forgotten in the emotional turmoil of separation and divorce.
What does it mean exactly—and how are the best interests of children determined by parents and by the BC courts?
Parents sometimes need to be reminded that the BC courts prioritize the best interests of the child in custody cases.
In fact, under the terms of BC’s Family Law Act (Section 37), the best interests of the child are the only consideration when making decisions that affect the child. As such, what’s best for the child’s parents or guardians is excluded from the decision-making process in BC courts.
“Best interests” refer to the physical, psychological, and emotional safety, security, and well-being of the child.
If the parents cannot decide on a suitable custody arrangement that meets all the child’s needs, the court must make an order that protects the child’s physical, psychological, and emotional safety, security, and well-being.
When determining the best interests of the child, the BC courts will consider multiple factors, as follows:
It should be noted that the fault of either parent for the marriage breakdown is not a factor considered in child custody decisions in British Columbia.
The general presumption is that the child benefits from the emotional, physical, and psychological support of both parents. This is seen as generally promoting the child’s well-being and development. By extension, this best serves the child’s best interests—unless there are factors that make it not so.
The preference in custody decisions in BC, therefore, is for parents to share rights and responsibilities for their children’s care after they separate. Usually, practical considerations mean that the child primarily resides with one parent while the other is allocated parenting time according to an agreed schedule—but both parents share decision-making responsibilities.
The specific circumstances in each case are closely examined and, sometimes, the best interests of the child may be best assured by granting sole custody to one parent. This is especially the case if the other parent is deemed unfit to carry out parental responsibilities or lives too far away to make a meaningful contribution to the child’s life. That parent will still retain parental rights in most cases, though.
In rare cases, restricting or removing the parental rights of one parent may be necessary to protect the well-being of the child.
The BC courts shield children from divorce and custody proceedings as much as possible and are cautious about involving them at all in such matters. Children do not participate directly in divorce proceedings and may not influence the outcome, depending on their level of maturity. However, in some cases, a child may need to be interviewed before final custody decisions are made.
Legally, all decisions regarding the welfare of the children after a divorce must be made or approved by the courts in British Columbia. The courts recognize the vulnerability of children in these situations.
Separations and divorces can become highly emotional, especially where children are involved and/or perceived wrongdoing by either parent has led to the marriage breakdown.
Sometimes, children can be used as a type of “weapon” to exact revenge on the other parent. For instance, the parent with whom the child primarily lives denies parenting time and contact with the child to the other parent. This is, generally speaking, strictly against the wishes of the court if shared decision-making and parenting have been ordered.
Such actions by a parent may be deemed harmful to the children—and, therefore, be subject to court action. The parent who is denied access to the child can petition the BC courts to consider the case.
The judge may be able to take the following actions:
In most cases, judges do not want to involve law enforcement or impose a harsh sentence on a parent who denies access as this might impact the ability to parent the child. That would likely be contrary to the child’s best interests.
In some limited instances, a parent may justifiably restrict access to the child for the other parent. Most notably, if there is a reasonable risk of harm from family violence, abuse or other detrimental behavior related to impairment by drugs or alcohol, a parent would be within his/her rights to deny access at parenting time.
Non-payment of child support by the non-residential parent is not, however, a justifiable reason to restrict contact with the child by the residential parent. Child support payments can be enforced using other measures.
If you’re considering child custody matters in the Langley area of British Columbia, DSG Family Law offers a free initial consultation to assess your situation and outline your legal options. Speak with a family lawyer today.
At DSG Family Law, we are pleased to offer a free consultation to discuss the particulars of your family’s situation. During this no-obligation meeting, you can share your concerns and goals with one of our experienced lawyers. We understand that every family’s circumstances are unique, and we want to ensure that we can provide you with the best guidance tailored to your specific needs.
In addition to the free consultation, we also offer Flat Fees for Uncontested Divorces and agreements. This transparent pricing structure allows you to have a clear understanding of the costs involved upfront, ensuring no surprises along the way.
DSG Family Law is committed to providing you with strategic & compassionate guidance for all your family law needs, with clear solutions to complex matters.
Schedule your consultation today, and let us take the first step towards finding the best solutions for you and your family.
website + branding by Designed by Harj | SEO by JurisPage
Suite B500 - 20020 84th Avenue
Langley, BC V2Y 5K9